Value identification and comparison functions
78%
Total Score
healthy
Healthy release with a long maintenance record; recent commit inactivity and unpinned workflow actions are the main caveats.
No build attestation or trusted-publisher provenance is present, leaving publication origin less independently verifiable. This is a transparency gap, not evidence that the release is unsafe.
A prepare install-time script adds some execution surface during installation. This is a modest supply-chain hygiene concern, though the available signals do not show that it is malicious or unusually complex.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, which is a meaningful recent maintenance slowdown. The regular release history and recent repository push partly offset, but do not erase, this concern.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency about vulnerability reporting and response expectations. Its security scanning tools provide partial compensation but do not replace a policy.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed, uses read-only permissions, and has no reported audit findings or untrusted-code sinks. However, all 11 action references are unpinned, weakening workflow reproducibility and update safety.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
type-detect Version ^4.1.0 | — | — |
@sinonjs/commons Version ^3.0.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.