The full stack toolkit to build onchain app UX.
88%
Total Score
100
100
94
70
100
One of 15 workflows uses pull_request_target, but no analyzed workflow checks out untrusted code or contains detected script injection. The isolated workflow pattern warrants awareness but is not severe on the available evidence.
The repository name does not match the package name and the package name is not present in the README, which can indicate a monorepo subpackage or an incorrect repository association. Organization ownership and the substantial AppKit monorepo provide context, but the association is not explicit in this signal.
No repository security policy was found. This weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency, although active maintenance and security scanning partly compensate.
Seven workflows lack top-level permission declarations and four declare top-level write access. The repository has some read-only and job-level restrictions, but the inconsistent permission hygiene remains a supply-chain maintenance concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
viem Version >=2.55.13 | — | — |
dayjs Version 1.11.13 | — | — |
big.js Version 6.2.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.