Bundle Remotion compositions using Webpack
82%
Total Score
healthy
Frequent releases and active development outweigh a workflow injection finding and missing build attestation.
The release has no build attestation or trusted-publisher provenance. This leaves artifact origin less independently verifiable despite the active organization-backed project.
The repository name does not match this package and its README does not mention @remotion/bundler. The organization and monorepo context make a name mismatch ordinary, but the absent README mention leaves package ownership somewhat less explicit.
The repository uses TypeScript, Turbo, npm scripts, and Vite, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a modest transparency gap rather than evidence of unsafe code.
No repository security policy was found. This reduces disclosure transparency, although the strong maintenance activity partly offsets the concern.
All six workflows were analyzed successfully, and the pull_request_target workflow has no untrusted checkout or script-injection count. However, a high-confidence template-injection finding in changelog.yml is a real workflow hygiene risk; the low-confidence cache-poisoning finding is minor.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
esbuild Version 0.28.1 | — | — |
webpack Version 5.105.0 | — | — |
remotion Version 4.0.535 | — | — |
css-loader Version 7.1.4 | — | — |
@rspack/core Version 1.7.11 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.