84%
Total Score
healthy
Active organization-backed project with strong packaging, but all workflow actions are unpinned and no security policy is published.
The package has four publishing accounts and clear WorkOS organization backing, but hadihallak (gmail.com) and chancestrickland (chance.dev) use outside-domain accounts, creating account-hygiene caution.
The repository name does not match this package and its README does not mention it, which creates some ownership ambiguity; the mismatch is plausibly explained by this package being part of a monorepo.
The repository uses established build and test tooling including Vitest, Vite, TypeScript, and npm scripts, but no security scanning tools were detected.
No repository security policy was found, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations less transparent.
All four workflows were analyzed without dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, script injection, or audit findings, but all 8 action references are unpinned and no workflow has a top-level permissions block; this is a workflow hygiene concern rather than a severe risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.