Testing module for Pinia
84%
Total Score
100
94
75
100
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention this package, creating some uncertainty about the package-to-repository association. The organization-backed monorepo context partly compensates for the name mismatch, but the absent README mention remains a transparency gap.
All four workflows were analyzed with no untrusted checkouts or script-injection findings. However, 10 of 13 action references are unpinned, and the audit reports high-severity cache-poisoning patterns at low confidence plus a trusted-publishing finding, so workflow hygiene warrants caution.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nostics Version ^1.1.4 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.