@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl

Repo package mentioncaution

The repository name does not match the package and its README does not mention this exact package, which creates some ownership ambiguity. The package README does point directly to this repository, partly compensating for that concern.

Repo toolingcaution

The project uses build tooling, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than evidence of abandonment.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear.

Workflow auditcaution

Both workflows were analyzed without untrusted checkouts or script injection, but all 21 action references are unpinned. The high-confidence trusted-publishing finding is informational in this audit, while the low-confidence cache findings are hygiene concerns rather than standalone severe risks.