It has a long release history, a stable major version, tests, and organization backing. MIT licensing and a small runtime dependency set are reassuring, though no security policy is published.
68%
Total Score
75
100
93
67
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. This is a meaningful maintenance warning, although the recent release history and push date provide some compensation.
The repository name does not match @parcel/graph and its README does not mention the package. Although a monorepo sub-package can explain the name mismatch, the missing README reference leaves package ownership less transparent.
The linked repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and vulnerability-reporting gap, though the repository does use Dependabot and other build tooling.
All 49 analyzed action references are unpinned, creating avoidable workflow supply-chain drift. High-confidence secrets-inherit findings also broaden credential exposure; the template-injection findings have no dangerous trigger or checkout sink shown here, while the cache findings are low confidence.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nullthrows Version ^1.1.1 | — | — |
@parcel/feature-flags Version 2.16.4 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.