Platform specific binary for lmdb on linux OS with x64 architecture
82%
Total Score
healthy
Healthy: frequent releases and active maintenance outweigh unpinned workflow actions and limited package-specific repository documentation.
The release has no build attestation or trusted-publisher record, leaving publication provenance less transparent despite the otherwise active project.
Only one account has registry publish access, which is a modest publishing-resilience concern. However, repository activity shows two active contributors, partly compensating for the narrow registry access list.
The repository name does not match this platform-specific package and its README does not mention the package, creating some uncertainty about package-to-repository linkage. The package's platform-specific role makes a monorepo relationship plausible but does not remove that transparency gap.
All 27 analyzed action references are unpinned, which weakens workflow reproducibility. The reported cache-poisoning findings are low-confidence hygiene observations, while the high-confidence adhoc-package findings are low severity; no untrusted checkout or script-injection path was found.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.