The package is licensed, typed, documented, and has no install-time scripts. Workflow review is incomplete and found high-confidence template-injection patterns plus package installs outside the lockfile, which warrant CI caution.
84%
Total Score
100
95
83
The repository name does not match the package and its README does not mention it, creating some package-to-source ambiguity; the Expo organization backing makes a monorepo relationship plausible but does not remove the gap.
The audit covered 30 of 53 workflows and found high-confidence template-injection patterns plus high-confidence ad hoc package installs; the pull_request_target workflows had no reported untrusted checkout or script-injection sink, so this is caution rather than a standalone severe risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
glob Version ^13.0.0 | — | — |
chalk Version ^4.1.0 | — | — |
debug Version ^4.3.2 | — | — |
getenv Version ^2.0.0 | — | — |
postcss Version ^8.5.14 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.