Notarize your Electron app
78%
Total Score
healthy
Recent releases and strong project backing outweigh a concentrated one-contributor maintenance pattern.
The package uses prepack and prepare lifecycle scripts, which add install and publication complexity; no provided signal shows those scripts are unsafe, so this is a limited supply-chain caution.
All three recent commits came from one contributor, with a 100% share, creating concentration risk. Organization ownership partly compensates because maintenance can be handed off internally.
The repository recorded three commits in the last three months, showing recent activity but a modest pace for a maintained project.
No repository security policy was found, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations less explicit; this is a transparency gap rather than evidence of unsafe code.
All five workflows were analyzed, use read-only permissions, and pin all 13 action references. High-confidence template-injection findings exist in docs.yml, but no untrusted checkout or script-injection sink was reported, so they remain a hygiene concern rather than a severe workflow risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
debug Version ^4.4.0 | — | — |
promise-retry Version ^2.0.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.