Checks if a package should be skipped for versioning or tagging purposes
88%
Total Score
healthy
Healthy: frequent releases and active, distributed maintenance outweigh minor workflow and package-reference caveats.
The repository name does not match the package and its README does not mention the package, creating some uncertainty about the exact package-to-repository mapping; the organization and monorepo context partly reduce that concern.
All three workflows were analyzed, use read-only permissions, and pin all 19 action references with no untrusted checkouts or script injections; the high-confidence trusted-publishing finding still warrants a small workflow hygiene caution.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
@changesets/types Version ^7.0.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.