Various type declarations used across Appium
78%
Total Score
healthy
Healthy overall, with workflow security hygiene and unclear package-to-repository identification as notable caveats.
The linked Appium monorepo name does not match the package and its README does not mention @appium/types, leaving package ownership less explicit even though a monorepo mismatch can be ordinary.
The project uses TypeScript, Gulp, Nx, and npm scripts for builds, but no security-scanning tools were detected; the missing scanning is a minor transparency gap.
All 33 action references are unpinned, and high-confidence template-injection findings affect manual release and version workflows; however, no untrusted checkout or script-injection paths were found, so this is workflow hygiene rather than a standalone severe risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
type-fest Version 5.10.0 | — | — |
@appium/schema Version 1.3.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.