JavaScript client for ingestion
88%
Total Score
88
100
95
70
100
One of three workflows uses pull_request_target, which warrants review because that trigger can be security-sensitive; however, no untrusted checkout or script-injection patterns were detected.
There are only 21 open issues and 3 open pull requests, but no issues or pull requests were opened or closed in the last month; this is a modest activity concern, partly offset by recent commits and releases.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention @algolia/ingestion, creating a package-to-repository transparency concern; the mismatch may reflect a monorepo, but the missing README mention remains a caution.
No SECURITY.md or equivalent security policy was found, reducing transparency for vulnerability reporting and response.
One workflow lacks top-level permissions and the release workflow has top-level write permissions; although another workflow is read-only, the permissions posture is not maximally restrictive.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
@algolia/client-common Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
@algolia/requester-fetch Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
@algolia/requester-node-http Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
@algolia/requester-browser-xhr Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.