JavaScript client for client-insights
88%
Total Score
90
100
95
70
100
One of three workflows uses pull_request_target, which deserves review because it can expose privileged workflow context, but no untrusted checkout or script-injection patterns were detected.
There are 21 open issues and 3 open pull requests, but no issues or pull requests were opened or closed in the last month. This is a mild activity gap, partly offset by recent commits and frequent releases.
The repository name does not match this subpackage and its README does not mention the package name, creating some ambiguity about package-to-repository mapping. However, the organization-owned monorepo structure and repository tree containing many client packages partly explain the mismatch.
No SECURITY.md or equivalent security policy was found, leaving vulnerability-reporting and response expectations less transparent.
One workflow lacks top-level permissions and the release workflow grants top-level write permissions. This is a workflow-hardening gap, although one workflow explicitly uses read-only permissions.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
@algolia/client-common Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
@algolia/requester-fetch Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
@algolia/requester-node-http Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
@algolia/requester-browser-xhr Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.