JavaScript client for abtesting
84%
Total Score
88
100
94
70
100
One of three workflows uses pull_request_target, which warrants review because that trigger can elevate workflow privileges, although no untrusted checkout or script-injection patterns were detected.
There were no new or closed issues or pull requests and no merged pull requests in the last month, which is a modest maintenance-visibility gap, though it is offset by recent commits and frequent releases.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention @algolia/abtesting, so the package-to-source relationship is less explicit; the organization-owned repository context partly offsets this because the package is plausibly part of a monorepo.
The repository has no SECURITY.md or other detected security policy, reducing vulnerability-reporting transparency.
One workflow lacks top-level permissions and the release workflow has top-level write permissions; this is a process-hardening gap, although another workflow explicitly uses read-only permissions.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
@algolia/client-common Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
@algolia/requester-fetch Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
@algolia/requester-node-http Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
@algolia/requester-browser-xhr Version 5.59.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.